Contrary to the general misconception, psychopaths – those born evil – for the most part evade the criminal justice system and wind up as extraordinarily ‘successful’ members of society. They can become CEOs, Supreme Court judges, Presidents, Central Bankers, Media Barons, and leading academics whose ideas can infect the thinking of whole generations.
I think a key to understanding how you can have ‘dumbass’ psychopaths who wind up in prison early on and intelligent ones who end up writing laws and running whole economies into the ground is that we need to consider not one but TWO bell curves on which to plot types of people. When we really get down to it, we’re dealing with two different species, each with its own spectrum of sub-types that are distributed across the two bell curves, and each one being completely alien to the other.
On one bell curve you have normal people. Most of us, of average intelligence and ability to empathise with others, fall somewhere in the middle of this bell curve. Some humans on the right of this curve are exceptionally talented and driven to help others, while others on the left of this curve are pretty dimwitted, but are also essentially kind-hearted, salt-of-the-Earth folks.
Then you have the psychopathic spectrum, which ought to be placed on a totally separate bell curve. These types all have no conscience. Most of them are middle-of-the-road psychos who leave a trail of destruction but generally keep getting away with it because of normies’ complete ignorance of psychopathy and a justice system that is organised on faulty foundations. Some of them do get caught and diagnosed early on, but that is only because they have such poor impulse control that they are so glaringly and obviously not human.
The most successful psychopaths, however, are a whole different kettle of fish. Placed at the far right end of this second bell curve, these super-dangerous types rise to the top and dominate society to the extent of reshaping it in their image. They’re smarter than their less intelligent cousins, possess the kind of ambition that wants to take over and consume the whole world and they appear to possess a kind of discipline: they too will kill, torture, rape, steal from and abuse people as they backstab their way to the top, but they generally keep such urges in check thanks to very well-constructed ‘masks of sanity’, from which they escape into regular and much-needed ‘vacations into filth’, as Harvey Cleckley described it.
That’s why mega-rich far-right wing fundamentalist religious preachers in the U.S. get down and dirty with transvestite prostitutes over some crystal meth on the weekends: the rest of the week they are practically holding their breath playing the role of ‘saintly people’ to their families, underlings and church flock. Their bizarre and sickening indulgences usually take place beyond the bounds of public scrutiny, where others like them will keep mum until such time as a little blackmail comes in handy.
These so-called ‘successful psychopaths’ present themselves as more normal than normal itself. It’s very difficult to catch them out, but it can be done. Once they do reach the top, it’s actually easier to spot them because they’re so busy getting payback on the society of normal man – they send people to wars they themselves create by profiting from arms sales to both sides; they sign off on laws that make life as stressful as possible for their enemy (the normal population below them); they dream up new ways of torturing people by drafting policy papers that hurt people fiscally through increased taxation, ‘austerity measures’ and so on, and also, especially post-9/11, by literally torturing people to justify a fully contrived ‘war on terror’, thanks to which they profit via their ‘security industry’; they pillage the real wealth from economies through their zombie banks, and so on.
Tragically, by the time they reach the top and are seen for what they are, the damage is already done and ‘civilization’ has nowhere to go but down. By this point, successful psychopaths will have eaten their way through the whole fabric of society like a parasitic cancer. Pathological people with mediocre talents are routinely promoted to positions of authority, stifling conscientious objectors who raise the alarm. Historically, normal people have dealt with endemic system-wide corruption by overthrowing their corrupt leaders in bloody revolutions, but because we as a species fail to understand why the disease keeps returning, it’s not long before psychopaths again rise to the top and the cycle begins anew.
With the psychopaths in power continuing to crank up the stress factor and global revolution in the air, the only hope I see for humanity is continuous dissemination of knowledge about psychopathy into the system; knowledge that will make people aware of psychopaths’ existence to begin with, and knowledge that will enable them to connect the dots and understand why the world has gone to hell in a handbasket.
Good idea on the two bell curves. The psychos need to be separated from normal humanity in graphs too (along with all other areas of life).
I dedicate a weekly television program to exposing the pathology of psychopaths who are in power. It’s called “Analyzing the 1%” and airs on Manhattan Neighborhood Network, Warner Cable 34 every Friday night at 8pm – or you can avail yourself of these programs through my youtube account MrGilbertGambucci. This link below is program Nr 14 entitled “Analyzing the Mental Illness of Those Who Wield Socio-economic Power”. All the best,
Interesting, thanks. I think you would thoroughly enjoy Political Ponerology: A Science on the Nature of Evil, Adjusted for Political Purposes, by Andrew Lobaczewski, available here: http://www.amazon.com/Political-Ponerology-Science-Adjusted-Purposes/dp/1897244258/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1361793792&sr=8-1&keywords=ponerology
It was finally published in 2006, but is actually based on studies of psychopaths in power from the 1930s onwards.
Here’s an article introducing the book, an interview between Italian journalist Silvia Cattori and the book’s editors: http://www.sott.net/article/148141-The-Trick-of-the-Psychopaths-Trade-Make-Us-Believe-that-Evil-Comes-from-Others
Thank you Niall. Could it be that some psychopaths are just more intelligent than others, just like the rest of us. Their only common feature is their lack of conscience?
I wonder if I could suggest an area of further research to you.
Could there be a correlation between reduced levels of oxytocin at delivery and psychopathy? Is there a preponderance of psychopaths born by cesarean section where oxytocin levels would be diminished… The Moral Molecule by Paul J Zac is suggesting oxytocin is the moral molecule.
Shakespeare said (Not verbatim!)’He that is not born of women will kill Macbeth’ was he referring to a psychopath born by cesarean..he probably was..could we prevent psychopathy? I have a son born by induced labour who has OCPD and went on to develop Anorexia Nervosa..My husband was born by cesarean over 60yrs ago and has some very uncaring traits..he’s a family doctor!! My daughter, a bright law student like her brother, had a psychopathic ex. boyfriend who was born by cesarean..it was her that made the link to Macbeth..
I would like to think it can be cured.The one thing I find so remarkable is how we are all programmed to not recognise personality disorders. No one dealing with anorexics seem capable of linking it to a very recognisable personality disorders..and people dealing with domestic violence can’t get their heads round psychopathy..
Hi Maggz, I am unfamiliar with that work, however I doubt that ‘a moral molecule’, a single missing component (in this case a particular hormone), can be responsible for genetic psychopathy. Same goes for singling out specific genes – or even one particular ‘evil gene’ that makes them so. I suspect that a whole combination of genetic factors come together to provide the genetic blueprint that resonates with a conscienceless being or entity.
Can psychopathy be prevented? We’re a long way off dealing with the problem because most are still unaware that a problem exists, but yes, I would like to think that smart conscientious people, working together, could come up with solutions to at least mitigate the damage they cause.
Regarding cesarean sections, there is no correlation that I know of. Psychopaths are also born with little to no childbirth complications, and are brought up with model child-rearing practices by loving families who provide all their needs.
The complications you describe among your loved ones sound like they are rooted in trauma. Childbirth could have played a role, but so could later developments during their upbringing, to say nothing of possible ‘past-life’ traumas carried over in the genetic blueprint.
Psychopaths make up a relatively small percentage of the overall population (around 6%). They do tremendous harm, especially once they reach positions of influence over others. The troubling thing is that so many ordinary people are damaged because they have incorporated psychopathic values into their worldview and now effectively behave no differently than the psychopaths.
We might say that a seed of conscience remains within them, but it is so denatured that there is little hope for many, if not most, to recover from being ‘pathologised’. Good people didn’t have good role models when they needed them. By now, in 2013, most of the ‘heroes’ have been assassinated or otherwise dealt with.
So, is there any hope? Perhaps in some non-linear way. We, individually, can take a stand, in spite of it all, to do what is right, to stand up for Truth, because it is the right thing to do.
Hi Niall. did you know Obama was born by CSection?
Leave a comment